Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francis Lau
19 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
6 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 3
6 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 5
6 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francis Lau
20 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Aarts
24 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francis Lau
11 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Albert Boonstra
Resubmission - Version 7
11 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Aug 2014 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-370

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement