Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between potential explanatory variables and overall patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) a

From: Implementation of chronic illness care in German primary care practices – how do multimorbid older patients view routine care? A cross-sectional study using multilevel hierarchical modeling

Variables

Regression coefficient

95% confidence interval

pvalueb

Patient characteristics

   

Sex

   

Female

−0.08

−0.2; 0.04

0.165

Male

Reference

  

Age (min. 65, max. 84 years)

   

Continuous

−0.00

−0.00; 0.00

0.23

Education level (CASMIN classification: 1 = low, 2 = middle, 3 = high)

   

Continuous

0.03

−0.01; 0.07

0.22

Autonomy of former occupation (value range from 0 = no occupation to 5 = occupation with high autonomy)

   

Continuous

0.04

0.02; 0.06

0.005

Household-adjusted regular monthly net income (in €)

   

Continuous

−0.00

−0.00; 0.00

0.23

No. of contacts with GP

   

Continuous

0.01

−0.01; 0.03

0.006

Weighted count of chronic conditions

   

Continuous

0.01

0.01; 0.01

0.095

Existence of a DMP disease c

   

Yes

0.11

0.05; 0.17

<0.001

No

Reference

  

Depression (GDS, possible values range: 0–15)

   

Continuous

−0.00

−0,02; 0,02

0.70

Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL, possible value range: 0–8)

   

Continuous

−0.01

−0.05; 0.03

0.67

Quality of life (visual analogue scale, possible value range: 0–100)

   

Continuous

0.00

0.00; 0.00

0.03

Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS grades: 0 = pain free to 4 = high disability, severely limiting)

   

Continuous

0.05

0.03; 0.07

<0.001

Self-efficacy scale (possible mean score range: 1–4)

   

Continuous

0.04

−0.02; 0.1

0.25

Social support (F-SozU K-14; possible mean overall score range: 1–5)

   

Continuous

0.16

0.12; 0.20

<0.001

GP characteristics

   

Sex

   

Female

0.12

0.00; 0.24

0.044

Male

Reference

  

Years of ownership of the practice

   

Continuous

−0.01

−0.01; −0.01

0.067

Practice type

   

Shared or group practice

−0.13

−0.23; −0.03

0.016

Solo practice

Reference

  

Practice size, i.e. number of patients treated in last three months

   

Continuous

−0.01

−0.07; 0.05

0.77

  1. aThese analyses are based on n = 3189 patients; missing values were imputed
  2. b p values marked in bold are statistically significant on the basis of a significance level of 0.05.
  3. cGerman DMPs exist for the following diseases: breast cancer, diabetes mellitus type I or II, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma.