Using QALYs in telehealth evaluations: a systematic review of methodology and transparency
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Strand Bergmo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Knighton|
|6 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Speedie|
|4 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Strand Bergmo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Knighton|
|24 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Speedie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|3 Aug 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-332|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.