Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Women’s preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten Howard
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Therese Dowswell
15 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hong Il Yoo
31 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten Howard
Resubmission - Version 4
31 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten Howard
Resubmission - Version 5
31 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hong Il Yoo
17 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten Howard
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Kirsten Howard
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
22 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
30 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-330

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement