Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Nationwide survey to evaluate the decision-making process in euthanasia requests in Belgium: do specifically trained 2nd physicians improve quality of consultation?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raphael Cohen-Almagor
25 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wadih Rhondali
11 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Cohen
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raphael Cohen-Almagor
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Cohen
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Cohen
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
16 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-307

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement