Improving accountability through alignment: the role of academic health science centres and networks in England
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewan Ferlie|
|6 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Wartman|
|25 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter brooks|
|2 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Pavel Ovseiko|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ewan Ferlie|
|10 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Wartman|
|15 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter brooks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.