Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with receptivity to become NC, FMG or FMG-NC (Path B), 2010 - Multilevel multinomial logistic regression† (n = 541*)

From: Impact of Québec’s healthcare reforms on the organization of primary healthcare (PHC): a 2003-2010 follow-up

Level Variables OR p-values
Clinic without FMG or NC status that expressed the desire to become FMG or NC
Organizational Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 0,638 0,363
  Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 1,495 0,313
  Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 3364 0,007
NC, FMG or FMG-NC    
Organizational Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 1,766 0,030
  Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 1.366 0,337
  Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 12,533 0,000
  1. †Adjusted for ICIT score (2003), proportion of the population aged 65 and over, proportion of the population with low income, number of general practitioners per 100,000 inhabitants and avoidable mortality rates in the HSSC territory.
  2. *Weighted by the number of FTE physicians in the clinic.
  3. Reference: Clinic without FMG or NC status that did not express the desire to become FMG or NC.