Impact of Québec’s healthcare reforms on the organization of primary healthcare (PHC): a 2003-2010 follow-up

Table 4 **Factors associated with receptivity to become NC, FMG or FMG-NC (Path B), 2010 - Multilevel multinomial logistic regression† (n = 541*)**

Level	Variables	OR	p-values
Clinic without FMG or NC status that expressed the desire to become FMG or NC
Organizational	Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	0,638	0,363
	Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	1,495	0,313
	Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	3364	0,007
NC, FMG or FMG-NC
Organizational	Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	1,766	0,030
	Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	1.366	0,337
	Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
	Positive	12,533	0,000

†Adjusted for ICIT score (2003), proportion of the population aged 65 and over, proportion of the population with low income, number of general practitioners per 100,000 inhabitants and avoidable mortality rates in the HSSC territory.
*Weighted by the number of FTE physicians in the clinic.
Reference: Clinic without FMG or NC status that did not express the desire to become FMG or NC.

ISSN: 1472-6963