Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors associated with ICIT score change (100-point scale) excluding receptivity (Path A), 2003 to 2010 – Multilevel linear regression† (n = 541*)

From: Impact of Québec’s healthcare reforms on the organization of primary healthcare (PHC): a 2003-2010 follow-up

Level Variables Coeff. p-values
Organizational Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 3,590 0,013
  Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 2,214 0,179
  Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)   
  Positive 8,371 0,000
Contextual Coercive influence (proportion of clinics judging positive HSSC actions) 0,080 0,137
  Normative influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of professional associations) -0,036 0,544
  Mimetic influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of PHC organizations) 0,033 0,421
  1. †Adjusted for ICIT score (2003), proportion of the population aged 65 and over, proportion of the population with low income, number of general practitioners per 100,000 inhabitants and avoidable mortality rates in the HSSC territory.
  2. *Weighted by the number of FTE physicians in the clinic.