Table 3 Comparing the two reviews
From: A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
| Â | Innvaer [[10]] | Current systematic review |
|---|---|---|
Number of studies | 24 | 145 |
Study designs | Mainly small survey and interview-based studies of policymakers’ perceptions | Mainly small survey and interview-based studies of policymakers’ perceptions with a minority of in-depth case studies |
Policy domains | All health | Mainly health, but with studies from a wide range of policy contexts |
Countries | Mainly OECD | At least 1/3 from LMIC |
Main facilitator | Personal contact between researchers and PMs | Available, clear and relevant research evidence |
Timeliness and relevance of research, with clear recommendations & high quality | Relationships, collaboration & contact between researchers and PMs | |
Research confirming current policy | Timing, practical managerial support and | |
Main barriers | Absence of personal contact between researchers and policymakers | Lack of clear or relevant research evidence, costs |
Lack of timeliness or relevance | Lack of timeliness or opportunity | |
Mutual mistrust between scientists and policymakers | Lack of PM research skills or awareness | |
Power and budget struggles |