Skip to main content

Table 5 Quotes identifying concerns related to hospital governing board functioning (open-ended responses)

From: Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field

Theme #1. Unclear authority of the Governing Board (GB)

Ambiguity in authority between GB and hospital management

The GB doesn't have authority to make decision on incentives.

Decisions made by GB have not implemented.

Even though hospital employees have ethical problems, the GB cannot take action because its role has not been clearly stated.

The role of GB in hospital should be stated clearly.

It would be good if the role and responsibility of GB and hospital management had clear demarcation.

What has been decided by the GB has not fully implemented.

The role of GB in taking actions on hospital employees when problems arise within in the hospital is not clearly stated.

The GB do not have full authority for every activity that took place in the hospital and if problems arose in the hospital, [they] do not taken corrective actions.

Ambiguity in authority between the GB and regional health bureau (RHB)

The GB has been ordered direct procurement of drugs but the regional regulations did not allow that.

The GB has limited authority to take corrective actions on employees. This is in the authority of civil service and health office.

There is no autonomy; decisions made by the GB have been violated by the regional health bureau.

The GB cannot participate in drug control and auditing because the role of GB in this regard is unclear, and this has resulted in drug wastage.

Sometimes the regional economic and development bureau interfere in budgeting, which was the GB’s responsibility.

It would be better if the CEO could report directly to the GB instead of regional health bureau.

Theme #2. Inadequate commitment and limited incentives for members to meet as a GB

Even though it is good to have a GB, the GB members are busy with their actual work; they do not have enough time to work for the GB.

In our zone, one person chairs three hospitals, which is inconvenient for the chair because he does not have enough time to get to know all information about the hospitals.

Most of GB members were high government officials; hence they do not give enough time to the GB committee.

Most of the governing board members are high government officials [and] they don’t [dedicate] enough time to the governing board.

The GB has not been meeting regularly.

The GB has never met every month [as it was supposed to] based on the legislation.

We have a shortage of time to monitor the hospital for we were busy.

Community representatives have not attended meeting as needed because they have private businesses.

The GB chair and members have been changed frequently.

We have concerns that some GB members may not be able to attend board meetings.

Inadequate payment for GB members.

Small GB members’ payment.

Little incentive payment to GB members.

There have been problems that the GBs were not performing well due to lack of payment

Theme #3. Ineffective communication and collaboration between the GB and the RHB

The GB and RHB have to meet at least twice a year (inferring they do not).

It would be good if the GB authority was limited and had been controlled by the RHB.

[There is] no relationship between GB and the RHB; hospital data have exclusively been reported to the RHB (rather than to the GB and then to the RHB.

The GB reports to the RHB, so the RHB [should] work closely with the GB, follow challenges of the GB, solve financial problems, and human resource.

Theme #4. Unmet training needs for GB members

Training should be given to GB members before they start work as GB members.

Give adequate training to employees in order to help them provide the community with faster service.

If GB members have received training on project designing… effective management style…how to give incentive to hospital staffs and retain them.

If the GB could receive all of the above-mentioned trainings.

[The GB needs] more capacity building training.

We lack of knowledge on how to lead hospital services because the GB members are not trained.

There should be orientation program for new GB members.

Training giving time and place should be convenient to members.

There should be an orientation program for new governing board members” and all additional training should be provided “on site, [rather] than outside of the district (another respondent).

Theme #5. Inadequate representation from community, district and zonal levels on GB

If GB composition comprised more community representatives, [that would be better].

It would be better if the GB composition comprised more community representatives.

The GB members of district hospital are assigned by zone and reported to zone that implies the board [is not from the community] and does not have direct relationship with region and has less power.

It would be better if the GB members were nominated from the district [more local] administration than from zonal administration.

It would be better if the GB members for district hospital had been nominated from the district administration.

The current GB comprises members from the same district administration, so it would be better if the composition could from different districts [that the hospital serves].

According to the legislation GB chair for zonal/general hospital should have been from zonal administration, but due to distance from the zonal town and [because] the zonal administrators not were unable to come for the GB meetings, the current GB is chaired by district administrator.