From: Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field
Theme #1. Unclear authority of the Governing Board (GB) | |
Ambiguity in authority between GB and hospital management | |
• | The GB doesn't have authority to make decision on incentives. |
• | Decisions made by GB have not implemented. |
• | Even though hospital employees have ethical problems, the GB cannot take action because its role has not been clearly stated. |
• | The role of GB in hospital should be stated clearly. |
• | It would be good if the role and responsibility of GB and hospital management had clear demarcation. |
• | What has been decided by the GB has not fully implemented. |
• | The role of GB in taking actions on hospital employees when problems arise within in the hospital is not clearly stated. |
• | The GB do not have full authority for every activity that took place in the hospital and if problems arose in the hospital, [they] do not taken corrective actions. |
Ambiguity in authority between the GB and regional health bureau (RHB) | |
• | The GB has been ordered direct procurement of drugs but the regional regulations did not allow that. |
• | The GB has limited authority to take corrective actions on employees. This is in the authority of civil service and health office. |
• | There is no autonomy; decisions made by the GB have been violated by the regional health bureau. |
• | The GB cannot participate in drug control and auditing because the role of GB in this regard is unclear, and this has resulted in drug wastage. |
• | Sometimes the regional economic and development bureau interfere in budgeting, which was the GB’s responsibility. |
• | It would be better if the CEO could report directly to the GB instead of regional health bureau. |
Theme #2. Inadequate commitment and limited incentives for members to meet as a GB | |
• | Even though it is good to have a GB, the GB members are busy with their actual work; they do not have enough time to work for the GB. |
• | In our zone, one person chairs three hospitals, which is inconvenient for the chair because he does not have enough time to get to know all information about the hospitals. |
• | Most of GB members were high government officials; hence they do not give enough time to the GB committee. |
• | Most of the governing board members are high government officials [and] they don’t [dedicate] enough time to the governing board. |
• | The GB has not been meeting regularly. |
• | The GB has never met every month [as it was supposed to] based on the legislation. |
• | We have a shortage of time to monitor the hospital for we were busy. |
• | Community representatives have not attended meeting as needed because they have private businesses. |
• | The GB chair and members have been changed frequently. |
• | We have concerns that some GB members may not be able to attend board meetings. |
• | Inadequate payment for GB members. |
• | Small GB members’ payment. |
• | Little incentive payment to GB members. |
• | There have been problems that the GBs were not performing well due to lack of payment |
Theme #3. Ineffective communication and collaboration between the GB and the RHB | |
• | The GB and RHB have to meet at least twice a year (inferring they do not). |
• | It would be good if the GB authority was limited and had been controlled by the RHB. |
• | [There is] no relationship between GB and the RHB; hospital data have exclusively been reported to the RHB (rather than to the GB and then to the RHB. |
• | The GB reports to the RHB, so the RHB [should] work closely with the GB, follow challenges of the GB, solve financial problems, and human resource. |
Theme #4. Unmet training needs for GB members | |
• | Training should be given to GB members before they start work as GB members. |
• | Give adequate training to employees in order to help them provide the community with faster service. |
• | If GB members have received training on project designing… effective management style…how to give incentive to hospital staffs and retain them. |
• | If the GB could receive all of the above-mentioned trainings. |
• | [The GB needs] more capacity building training. |
• | We lack of knowledge on how to lead hospital services because the GB members are not trained. |
• | There should be orientation program for new GB members. |
• | Training giving time and place should be convenient to members. |
• | There should be an orientation program for new governing board members” and all additional training should be provided “on site, [rather] than outside of the district (another respondent). |
Theme #5. Inadequate representation from community, district and zonal levels on GB | |
• | If GB composition comprised more community representatives, [that would be better]. |
• | It would be better if the GB composition comprised more community representatives. |
• | The GB members of district hospital are assigned by zone and reported to zone that implies the board [is not from the community] and does not have direct relationship with region and has less power. |
• | It would be better if the GB members were nominated from the district [more local] administration than from zonal administration. |
• | It would be better if the GB members for district hospital had been nominated from the district administration. |
• | The current GB comprises members from the same district administration, so it would be better if the composition could from different districts [that the hospital serves]. |
• | According to the legislation GB chair for zonal/general hospital should have been from zonal administration, but due to distance from the zonal town and [because] the zonal administrators not were unable to come for the GB meetings, the current GB is chaired by district administrator. |