The cost-utility of open prostatectomy compared with active surveillance in early localised prostate cancer
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Willis|
|6 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Kearns|
|7 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Florian Koerber|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Kearns|
|14 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Willis|
|25 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Florian Koerber|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-14-163|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.