Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: It takes patience and persistence to get negative feedback about patients’ experiences: a secondary analysis of national inpatient survey data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth West
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl
18 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Siri Wiig
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth West
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth West
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-153

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement