Table 4 Importance ratings
From: The consumer quality index anthroposophic healthcare: a construction and validation study
Items | Importance rating |
|---|---|
Practice | |
22. (inside environment of practice building) | 2,5 |
GP’s interactional style | |
43. (making comfortable) | 3,1 |
44. (showing understanding) | 3,4 |
45. (providing insight in background and causes) | 3,4 |
46. (helping to cope with constraints) | 3,0 |
47. (attention for social consequences) | 2,8 |
48. (providing needed care) | 3,4 |
49. (balanced attitude) | 3,2 |
Treatment/intervention | |
68. (anthroposophic treatment options) | 2,9 |
69. (free choice of treatment options) | 3,1 |
70. (free choice of type of medication) | 3.1 |
71. (consensus about treatment) | 3,1 |
73. (focus on physiological self-healing) | 3.2 |
Anthroposophic view | |
74. (providing insight in situation) | 3,0 |
75. (patients’ own responsibility) | 3,0 |
76. (patients’ active contribution) | 3,1 |
77. (support of GP) | 2,9 |
78. (giving meaning within daily life) | 2,9 |
79. (support on personal growth) | 2,7 |
80. (spiritual meaning) | 2,1 |
Perceived treatment effect | |
83. (prevalence of side effects) | 2,7 |
84. (influence on quality of life) | 3,1 |
Separate items with other answer catagories: no importance analysis | - |