Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Translating and testing the Alberta context tool for use among nurses in Swedish elder care

  • Ann Catrine Eldh1, 6Email author,
  • Anna Ehrenberg2,
  • Janet E Squires3, 4,
  • Carole A Estabrooks5 and
  • Lars Wallin1, 2
BMC Health Services Research201313:68

Received: 24 September 2012

Accepted: 13 February 2013

Published: 19 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
24 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joyce Wilkinson
6 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jay Ford
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-68

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Karolinska Institute, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society
School of Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program
University of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Knowledge Utilization Studies Program
CRU, Karolinska University Hospital Solna