Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Potential for patient-physician language discordance in Ontario

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
10 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sears
Resubmission - Version 2
10 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alden Blair
13 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ilene Hyman
25 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Bischoff
9 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sears
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alden Blair
5 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Bischoff
6 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sears
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sears
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-535

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement