Table 5 Efficiency results for 2009 and 2010 (input orientation)

θ _CRS average

0.793

0.816

0.764

0.769

0.913

0.935

0.918

min θ _CRS

0.581

0.569

0.469

0.465

0.761

0.817

0.745

DMU with min θ _CRS

2

2

21

11

11

11

2

Number of efficient DMUs (CRS)

4

6

5

6

8

8

6

DMUs with θ _CRS >95%

4

6

6

7

9

11

12

DMUs with θ _CRS <60%

2

1

5

3

0

0

0

Most common benchmarks (CRS)

22

22

17

17

17

17

8

θ _VRS average

0.852

0.857

0.839

0.849

0.944

0.961

0.928

min θ _VRS

0.585

0.595

0.581

0.520

0.775

0.835

0.754

DMU with min θ _VRS

11

2

21

15

11

15

2

Number of efficient DMUs (VRS)

7

8

8

7

11

13

9

DMUs with θ _VRS >95%

9

8

8

9

13

15

12

DMUs with θ _VRS <60%

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

Most common benchmarks (VRS)

15

13 e 22

5

17

17

13 e 17

14

θ _Scale average

0.935

0.954

0.905

0.903

0.968

0.972

0.990

min θ _Scale

0.722

0.783

0.690

0.622

0.837

0.848

0.960

DMU with min θ _Scale

15

17

9

9

12

5

9

Number of scale efficient DMUs

4

6

5

6

8

8

7

DMUs with θ _Scale >95%

11

17

8

10

17

17

22

DMUs with θ _Scale <60%

0

0

0

0

0

0

0