Skip to main content

Table 4 Documentation of rheumatic heart disease information in health centre clinical records of people with ARF/RHD 1

From: Improvement in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease management and prevention using a health centre-based continuous quality improvement approach

 

Risk classification

2008

2009

2010

p value

Diagnosis recorded on Client’s clinical record summary sheet

Recurrent or suspected recurrent ARF episode

56% (31/55)

73% (44/60)

81% (50/62)

0.004

Rheumatic heart disease

84% (115/137)

86% (115/133)

90% (135/150)

0.12

Documentation of risk classification in full clinical record

All

56% (87/154)

71% (103/145)

76% (118/156)

<0.001

High/Med

36% (50/138)

43% (45/104)

46% (56/122)

0.11

Documentation of risk classification in the clinical record summary sheet page?

All

29% (44/154)

34% (50/145)

56% (88/156)

<0.001

High/Med

35% (24/69)

42% (22/52)

64% (39/61)

0.001

ARF/RHD management plan in notes

All

46% (71/154)

57% (83/145)

53% (83/156)

0.22

High/Med

51% (35/69)

77% (40/52)

62% (38/61)

0.15

Low/Undetermined

42% (36/85)

46% (43/93)

47% (45/95)

0.50

Current prescription on file

All

66% (77/116)

82% (81/99)

58% (60/103)

0.24

High/Med

72% (41/57)

82% (36/44)

64% (30/47)

0.41

Low/Undetermined

61% (36/59)

82% (45/55)

54% (30/56)

0.43

Smoking status recorded

All

23% (36/154)

40% (58/145)

38% (60/156)

0.005

Attendance within the previous month

All

68% (105/154)

63% (92/145)

65% (101/156)

0.53

High/Med

71% (49/69)

62% (32/52)

80% (49/61)

0.27

Low/Undetermined

66% (56/85)

65% (60/93)

55% (52/95)

0.56

Attendance within the previous three months

All

84% (129/154)

90% (130/145)

86% (134/156)

0.59

High/Med

86% (59/69)

90% (47/52)

93% (57/61)

0.14

Low/Undetermined

82% (70/85)

89% (83/93)

81% (77/95)

0.77

  1. 1Except for the two indicators “Documentation of risk classification in clinical record” and “Documentation of risk classification in the clinical record summary sheet” all risk classifications are based on documented risk classification where available or, if there was no clear documented risk classification, assessment by auditor applying an algorithm to clinical data available in the record.
  2. Bold text is used to highlight p-values of <0.05.