This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Changes in health care utilisation following a reform involving choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care: a five-year follow-up of GP-visits
© Beckman and Anell; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 March 2013
Accepted: 28 October 2013
Published: 31 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Igor Svab|
|9 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kaja Polluste|
|12 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bo Burstrom|
|4 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anders Beckman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anders Beckman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|31 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-452|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.