Skip to main content

Table 5 Regression results of revenue sharing and quality of care

From: Practice size, financial sharing and quality of care

Dependant variable Access Comp-ness Continuity CDM Disease prevention Health promotion
Share revenue 0.019856 0.16 −0.009157 0.159041 0.021494 0.0963***
LnFP 0.00419 0.09** −0.029084*** 0.098929 0.052783 0.02344**
Share *LnFP −0.008815 −0.07 −0.001901 −0.12157 −0.03369 −0.05371**
Patient = female 0.020599**   0.014561*** −0.069235* 0.198467*** −0.03505***
Patient Age 0.001236**   0.000924*** 0.003226** −0.00363*** −0.00059*
Chronic disease    0.033177***    
% of Female FPs      0.149436*** 0.07312***
% of Canadian educated FPs 0.079598***   0.060374*** 0.300983***   
Years since grad (FPs) 0.001713***   0.00296***    −0.00309***
Rurality Index −0.000572***      
# NP    −0.05069***   −0.0852**  
Other HP Exists   0.172***     
Other Hospital >10 km 0.047203*** 0.113*     
EMR    0.029992***    
Model (FFS ref)       
FHN 0.035123*** −0.009 −0.001075 −0.05553 0.10145*** 0.01585
HSO 0.076212*** −0.1 0.023328* 0.023554 −0.02632  
Constant 0.546303*** 0.512*** 0.696944*** 0.030827 0.51964*** 0.25253***
R2   0.713     
# Cases 2270 52 2270 1680 1680 2270
  1. NP, Nurse practitioner; *indicates significance at the p < 0.10 level, **indicates significance at the p < 0.05 level, ***indicates significance at the p < 0.01 level.