Practice size, financial sharing and quality of care

Table 5 Regression results of revenue sharing and quality of care

Dependant variable	Access	Comp-ness	Continuity	CDM	Disease prevention	Health promotion
Share revenue	0.019856	0.16	−0.009157	0.159041	0.021494	0.0963^***
LnFP	0.00419	0.09^**	−0.029084^***	0.098929	0.052783	0.02344^**
Share *LnFP	−0.008815	−0.07	−0.001901	−0.12157	−0.03369	−0.05371^**
Patient = female	0.020599^**		0.014561^***	−0.069235^*	0.198467^***	−0.03505^***
Patient Age	0.001236^**		0.000924^***	0.003226^**	−0.00363^***	−0.00059^*
Chronic disease			0.033177^***
% of Female FPs					0.149436^***	0.07312^***
% of Canadian educated FPs	0.079598^***		0.060374^***	0.300983^***
Years since grad (FPs)	0.001713^***		0.00296^***			−0.00309^***
Rurality Index	−0.000572^***
# NP			−0.05069^***		−0.0852^**
Other HP Exists		0.172^***
Other Hospital >10 km	0.047203^***	0.113^*
EMR			0.029992^***
Model (FFS ref)
FHN	0.035123^***	−0.009	−0.001075	−0.05553	0.10145^***	0.01585
HSO	0.076212^***	−0.1	0.023328^*	0.023554	−0.02632
Constant	0.546303^***	0.512^***	0.696944^***	0.030827	0.51964^***	0.25253^***
R²		0.713
# Cases	2270	52	2270	1680	1680	2270

NP, Nurse practitioner; ^*indicates significance at the p < 0.10 level, ^**indicates significance at the p < 0.05 level, ^***indicates significance at the p < 0.01 level.

ISSN: 1472-6963