Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: International developments in revenues and incomes of general practitioners from 2000 to 2010

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Madelon Kroneman
Resubmission - Version 4
25 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Madelon Kroneman
Resubmission - Version 5
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Madelon Kroneman
Resubmission - Version 6
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Doran
5 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Li
10 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mai Pham
22 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Madelon Kroneman
Resubmission - Version 7
22 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Li
21 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Doran
29 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mai Pham
25 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Madelon Kroneman
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
15 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
24 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-436

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement