|
Intervention departments
|
Control departments
|
Significance testing
|
---|
|
Baseline
|
Follow-up
|
Baseline
|
Follow-up
|
Group x Time
|
---|
|
N = 19
|
N = 21
|
N = 19
|
N = 16
|
(ANOVA)
|
---|
Indicators of hospital physicians’ work conditions
|
M
|
SD
|
M
|
SD
|
M
|
SD
|
M
|
SD
|
F(df = 1); p
|
---|
1
|
Workflow interruptions
|
4.04
|
.67
|
3.77
|
.68
|
4.05
|
.59
|
4.06
|
.47
|
0.69; n. s.
|
2
|
Conflicts in role and task demands
|
3.42
|
.60
|
2.83
|
.67
|
3.30
|
.82
|
3.27
|
.64
|
3.03; .09
†
|
3
|
Colleague support
|
3.11
|
.77
|
3.38
|
.74
|
3.58
|
.68
|
3.31
|
.46
|
2.91; .09
†
|
4
|
Quality losses
|
3.12
|
.95
|
2.83
|
.73
|
2.98
|
.93
|
2.83
|
.74
|
0.54; n. s.
|
5
|
Quality of cooperation with patient relatives
|
3.47
|
.51
|
3.71
|
.56
|
3.74
|
.65
|
3.44
|
.63
|
3.90; .05*
|
6
|
Quality of cooperation with nursing staff
|
3.74
|
.73
|
4.05
|
.59
|
4.00
|
.88
|
3.81
|
.66
|
2.21; n. s.
|
- Note: N Number of Physicians, M Mean, SD Standard deviation, Scale Range: Scale of indicators 1-4 1 = “not at all” to 5 = “yes, to a very great extent”; Scale of Indicators 5 and 6 1 = “very bad” to 5 = “very good”; *p < .05 Significance level, †p < .10 Significance level.