Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Players and processes behind the national health insurance scheme: a case study of Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas O'Connell
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manuela De Allegri
12 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Akua Agyepong
16 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Hagopian
11 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Thomas O'Connell
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Hagopian
26 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Akua Agyepong
19 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Thomas O'Connell
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Thomas O'Connell
7 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Akua Agyepong
12 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Hagopian
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
17 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-357

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement