Skip to main content

Table 5 Six binomial logistic regression models for dependent variable: appointment

From: Inequities in access to healthcare: analysis of national survey data across six Asia-Pacific countries

Country

1. AU

2. HK

3. JP

4. KR

5. TW

6. TL

(Models for DV2)

Model fit χ2 (df)

125.79 (18)***

103.79(5)***

36.87(8)***

18.45(4)**

16.50(2)***

47.09(11)***

N response/N total

816/1044 (78.2%)

667/674 (99.0%)

996/1000 (99.6%)

990/1006 (98.4%)

1157/1200 (96.4%)

1185/1200 (98.8%)

Nagelkerke R2

0.19

0.19

0.06

0.03

0.02

0.05

Independent Variable

Waldχ2(df) p*

Waldχ2(df) p*

Waldχ2(df) p*

Waldχ2 df) p*

Waldχ2 (df) p*

Waldχ2(df) p*

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

Coefficient

Coefficient

Coefficient

Coefficient

Coefficient

Coefficient

Sex

-

’

’

’

’

’

Male (ref)

1.00

0

Female

18.59χ2 (1)***

’

’

’

’

’

00.50 (0.37–0.69)

−0.69

Age

27.55χ2(5)***

82.60χ2(5)***

’

’

’

15.27(5)**

< 20 (ref)

1.00

1.00

1.00

0

0

0

20–29 (ref)

20.94χ2(1)***

’

17.45χ2(4)**

’

’

’

18.87 (3.69–31.65)

1.00

2.38

0

30–39

12.02χ2(1)**

’

’

’

’

’

6.97 (2.33–20.88)

1.94

40–49

14.59χ2(1)***

’

’

’

’

’

7.91 (2.62–23.91)

2.07

50–59

16.74χ2(1)***

’

’

’

’

’

10.43 (3.39–32.07)

2.35

60+

20.83χ2(1)***

30.04χ2(1)***

11.62χ2(1)**

’

’

’

13.86 (4.48–42.88)

0.13 (0.06–0.27)

2.37 (1.44–3.90)

2.63

−2.04

0.86

Marital status

15.05χ2(5)**

’

’

’

’

’

Never married (ref)

1.00

0

Married

12.56χ2(1)**

’

’

’

’

 

0.62 (0.27–0.70)

−0.83

Divorced

’

’

’

’

’

 

Widowed

’

’

’

’

’

 

Separate

’

’

’

’

’

 

Cohabiting

’

’

’

’

’

 

Work status

’

’

’

’

’

34.93χ2(6)***

Full-time

1.00

0

Part-time

’

’

’

’

’

6.37χ2(1)*

0.45 (0.24–0.84)

−0.80

Self-employed

’

’

’

’

’

’

Work for family

’

’

’

’

’

31.24χ2(1)***

0.34 (0.23–0.49)

−1.09

Retired/pensioner

’

’

’

’

’

’

Housewife/househusband

’

’

’

’

’

’

Student/

’

’

’

’

’

’

Unemployed/

Other

Subjective health

19.14χ2(2)***

’

’

Dissatisfied (ref)

Dissatisfied (ref)

’

satisfaction

1.00

15.90χ2(2)***

16.73χ2(2)***

Unhappy (ref)

0

1.00

1.00

0

0

Average

3.34χ2(1)

’

’

’

’

’

1.78 (0.96–3.29)

0.57

Happy

14.36χ2(1)***

’

’

Satisfied

Satisfied

’

3.10 (1.73–5.56)

7.02χ2(1)**

15.20χ2(1)***

1.13

1.77 (1.16–2.71)

2.31 (1.52–3.51)

0.57

0.84

Financial situation in

12.38χ2(3)**

’

’

’

’

’

last year

1.00

Save money (ref)

0

Just get by

9.85χ2(1)**

’

’

’

’

’

0.56 (0.39–0.80)

−0.59

Spent some savings

4.97χ2(1)*

’

’

’

’

’

0.62 (0.40–0.94)

−0.49

Spent savings &

5.70χ2(1)*

’

’

’

’

’

borrowed money

0.50 (0.28–0.88)

−0.69

Self-rated health

’

’

26.46χ2(4)***

’

’

’

Very dissatisfied

1.00

0

Dissatisfied

’

’

’

’

’

’

Average

’

’

’

’

’

’

Satisfied

’

’

10.30χ2(1)**

’

’

’

0.31 (0.15–0.64)

−1.16

Very satisfied

’

’

’

’

’

’

Chronic health

’

’

’

’

’

’

condition

(Yes ref)

No

3.83χ2(1)*

’

’

’

’

’

1.41 (1.00–1.98)

 

0.34

     
  1. Ref: reference level, * p<.05; ** p<.01, *** p<.001.