Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Does implementation of a hospitalist program in a Canadian community hospital improve measures of quality of care and utilization? an observational comparative analysis of hospitalists vs. traditional care providers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Sebastien Rachoin
10 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luci Leykum
19 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Vandad Yousefi
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Vandad Yousefi
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean-Sebastien Rachoin
8 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Vandad Yousefi
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 May 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-204

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement