Skip to main content

Table 4 Multi-level logistic regression models for high attendance at lifestyle modification program

From: Factors influencing participation in a vascular disease prevention lifestyle program among participants in a cluster randomized trial

Explanatory variables

 

Empty model

Model 11

Participant Characteristics

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

SEIFA index2

Least disadvantaged

 

1.00 (reference)

 

Intermediate disadvantage

 

1.24 (0.35-4.32)

 

Most disadvantaged

 

2.17 (0.21-22.15)

Employment status

Working

 

1.0 (reference)

Not working3

2.39 (1.15-4.94)*

Psychological distress

Low/moderate distress

 

1.00 (reference)

(K10 score: 16+)

High distress

2.17 (1.10-4.30)*

Practice Characteristics

   

Practice size

Large practice (5+ GPs)

 

1.00 (reference)

Medium practice (3–4 GPs)

 

1.73 (0.60-5.05)

Small practice (1–2 GPs)

3.46 (0.79-15.03)

Practice employs or rents rooms to allied health professional

No

 

1.00 (reference)

Yes

2.24 (0.34-14.67)

Practice has written protocol for preventative care

No

 

1.00 (reference)

Yes

1.60 (0.33-7.83)

Between practice variance (SE3)

 

0.410 (0.277)

0.023 (0.132)

Intra class correlation

 

0.111

0.007

Explained variance 4 (%)

 

-

94.4%

  1. *P < 0.05.
  2. Multilevel logistic regression1 Model 1: includes all variables found to be significant in univariate analysis. 2 2006 index of relative socio-economic advantage/disadvantage, 3 Standard error, 4 Explained ‘between practice variance using the variance in the empty model as reference.