Measurement instrument (completed by) | Clinical vignettes with quality indicators | Self report questionnaire | Observations with coding sheet | Group interviews | Document analysis of PDP’s and PQIP’s | Field notes | General evaluation questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Participants) | (Participants) | (GR, JH) | (GR, JH, AS) | (Participants) | (GR, JH, AS) | (Participants) | |
Guideline adherence | ✓ | ||||||
Individual and organizational determinants | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Fidelity | |||||||
Content of the intervention | |||||||
 1. Which important subjects from the analyses are addressed in the intervention? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
 2. Which methods and applications are actually applied (PT and PQM)? | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
 3. Which determinants are addressed during the intervention? | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
Execution of the intervention | |||||||
 4. Are methods and applications applied as intended (why not)? | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
 5. How is the extent of participation to the individual modules of the intervention? | ✓ | ||||||
Acceptability | |||||||
Materials | |||||||
 6. How do participants judge the concept of the revised guideline? | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
 7. Do PTs apply the patient information leaflet and why/why not? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
General | |||||||
 8. Do the participants evaluate the intervention as acceptable (tailored to personal level; sufficient interaction; providing new and useful knowledge and skills)? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
 9. How do the participants value the intervention and its individual applications? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
 10. How do the participants value the trainers of the intervention? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
 11. Does the intervention evoke higher commitment to quality management (PQP, monitoring of this PQP, sustaining the quality management)? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
Feasibility | |||||||
 12. Is the implementation of the intervention in its current form feasible? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
 13. If not, what should change to enhance the feasibility of the programme? | ✓ | ✓ |