This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Adult ADHD patient experiences of impairment, service provision and clinical management in England: a qualitative study
© Matheson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 October 2012
Accepted: 15 May 2013
Published: 21 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Matheson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maurice Place|
|6 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandra Philipsen|
|11 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Matheson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandra Philipsen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|21 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-184|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.