Open Peer Review Reports for: Official statistics and claims data records indicate non-response and recall bias within survey-based estimates of health care utilization in the older population
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 24 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Hunger |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 6 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Falk Hoffmann |
| 7 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guohong Li |
| 11 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthias Hunger |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 18 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Falk Hoffmann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-1 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
