|
Health level
|
Effectiveness on individual level
|
Interventions that are effective in reduction of the morbidity and mortality, as measured on individual person level, may deserve priority.
|
|
Effectiveness on population level
|
Interventions that are effective in reduction of the morbidity and mortality, as measured on population level, may deserve priority.
|
|
Patient reported health status
|
Interventions that have high impact on patient reported health status may deserve priority.
|
|
Safety
|
Interventions that do not harm in terms of morbidity and mortality may deserve priority.
|
|
Health distribution
|
Various criteria
|
All criteria proposed in the map have the same underlying rationale: all people should have as much of a fair chance to live a healthy life, and therefore interventions focusing on certain social groups may deserve priority.
|
|
Responsiveness
|
Patient perceived quality of care
|
Interventions that are responsive according to patient’s expectations of quality of care may deserve priority.
|
|
Burden of disease
|
Interventions that focus on a high burden of disease in society may deserve priority.
|
|
Social & financial risk protection
|
Catastrophic health expenditure
|
Health care related costs can push people into poverty. Interventions that protect people against catastrophic health expenditure may deserve priority.
|
|
Economic productivity & care for others
|
People who are economically productive and/or take care of others and become ill face income loss and health related costs, which could lead to poverty. Interventions that target those people may deserve priority.
|
|
Rare diseases
|
Interventions for rare diseases might be very costly (because of the small number patients) and could push people into poverty. Therefore, these interventions may deserve priority.
|
|
Improved efficiency
|
Size of target population
|
Interventions that show economies of scale because they target a high number of people may deserve priority.
|
|
Feasibility
|
Service delivery
|
Service requirements
|
Interventions that are easy to implement because of the current service capacity may have priority. E.g. availability of: service infrastructure, delivery models, safety and quality and management.
|
|
Health workforce
|
Health workforce requirements
|
Interventions that are easy to implement because of the current health workforce capacity may have priority. E.g. availability workforce and workforce policies, preferences of workforce for working conditions.
|
|
Information
|
Information requirements
|
Interventions that are easy to implement because of the current information system capacity may have priority. E.g. availability of surveillance systems.
|
|
Medical products, vaccines & technology
|
Medical products, vaccines & technology requirements
|
Interventions that are easy to implement because of the current medical products, vaccines & technology capacity may have priority. E.g. norms, standards and reliability procurement.
|
|
Financing
|
Unit costs
|
Interventions that have small unit cost per patient may have priority.
|
|
Budget impact
|
Interventions that consume a small part of the budget may have priority.
|
|
Financing party
|
Interventions that receive sustainable financing may have priority.
|
|
Leadership/governance
|
Congruency previous priority setting
|
Interventions that are in line with previous spending pattern may have priority.
|
|
Cultural acceptability
|
Interventions that are cultural acceptable, because of the norms and values, may have priority.
|
|
Political acceptability
|
Interventions that are political acceptable may have priority.
|
|
Stakeholder acceptability
|
Interventions that are accepted by important stakeholder groups (e.g. patients groups, taxpayers, health care providers, donor agencies, voters) may have priority.
|
|
Legal barriers
|
Interventions that face no legal barriers may have priority.
|
