Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Expenditure and resource utilisation for cervical screening in Australia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bengt Andrae
27 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
3 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jie-Bin Lew
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jie-Bin Lew
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jie-Bin Lew
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jie-Bin Lew
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
18 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bengt Andrae
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-446

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement