Skip to main content


We are working on a new version of this page and we'd like your opinion. See an early preview or learn more.

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study

  • David E Goldsbury1Email author,
  • Katie Armstrong1,
  • Leonardo Simonella1,
  • Bruce K Armstrong2 and
  • Dianne L O’Connell1, 2, 3, 4
BMC Health Services Research201212:387

Received: 27 June 2012

Accepted: 3 November 2012

Published: 9 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Moyez Jiwa
30 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - allan spigelman
7 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brigid Lynch
22 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - David Goldsbury
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-387

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales
School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health University of Newcastle