This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparing hospital mortality – how to count does matter for patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and hip fracture
© Kristoffersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 September 2011
Accepted: 15 October 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bekele Afessa|
|4 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Goldacre|
|6 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Doris Tove Kristoffersen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bekele Afessa|
|6 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Tennant|
|4 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Doris Tove Kristoffersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-364|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.