Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors associated with the number of consultations per dietetic treatment: an observational study

  • Jacqueline Tol1Email author,
  • Ilse C Swinkels1,
  • Peter M Spreeuwenberg1,
  • Chantal J Leemrijse1,
  • Dinny H de Bakker1, 2 and
  • Cindy Veenhof1
BMC Health Services Research201212:317

Received: 21 December 2011

Accepted: 6 September 2012

Published: 14 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
21 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kirsten Whitehead
17 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jacqueline Tol
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-317

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
Scientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (TRANZO), Tilburg University