Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An assessment of the accuracy and availability of data in electronic patient tracking systems for patients receiving HIV treatment in central Mozambique

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Barrot Lambdin
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Lowrance
23 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dorothy Curtis
31 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Barrot Lambdin
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dorothy Curtis
12 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Morales
7 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Barrot Lambdin
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Morales
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement