Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluating the effects of variation in clinical practice: a risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis of acute stroke services

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerry Richardson
6 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Geisler
20 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Clarabelle Pham
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund
7 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Geisler
3 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Clarabelle Pham
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
23 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
28 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-266

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement