Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness of counselling, graded-exercise and usual care for chronic fatigue: evidence from a randomised trial in primary care

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Thomas
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hollingworth
25 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hollingworth
24 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-264

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement