Patients' experiences of the quality of long-term care among the elderly: comparing scores over time
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Dec 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Fitzpatrick|
|8 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Sangl|
|6 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Freedom Nkhululeko Gumedze|
|7 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marloes Zuidgeest|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Freedom Nkhululeko Gumedze|
|8 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Sangl|
|18 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marloes Zuidgeest|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.