This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Perceptions of cardiac rehabilitation patients, specialists and rehabilitation programs regarding cardiac rehabilitation wait times
© Grace et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 February 2012
Accepted: 13 August 2012
Published: 16 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Curtis|
|23 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thorsten Meyer|
|18 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jurriaan Oudhoff|
|25 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sherry Grace|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Curtis|
|19 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jurriaan Oudhoff|
|24 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sherry Grace|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-259|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.