This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials
- Liz Glidewell†1, 2Email author,
- Ruth Thomas†2,
- Graeme MacLennan†2,
- Debbie Bonetti†3,
- Marie Johnston†4,
- Martin P Eccles†5,
- Richard Edlin6,
- Nigel B Pitts3,
- Jan Clarkson3,
- Nick Steen5 and
- Jeremy M Grimshaw7
© Glidewell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 March 2012
Accepted: 8 August 2012
Published: 14 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Liz Glidewell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Edwards|
|17 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Edwards|
|11 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Liz Glidewell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Edwards|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-250|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.