Table 2 Summary of economic evaluations comparing supervised centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) vs no cardiac rehabilitation (No-CR)
From: A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation
Author (Year) | Perspective | Patient populations | Study type | Currency, price year | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Levin et al. (1991) | Societal | N = 305 after MI | CCA | Swedish kroner, ?year | CR: SEK73,500 less per patient |
Ades et al. 1992 | Patients/ payers | N = 580 after MI/CABG | CCA | US dollars, 1991 | CR: $739 less in hospitalization costs per patient |
Oldridge et al. (1993) | Societal | N = 201 after MI | CUA/ modelling | US dollars, 1991 | CR: $21,800 per life-year gained; $9,200 per QALY gained at 1 year |
Ades et al. (1997) | Patients/ Payers | Not applicable | Economic modeling | US dollars, 1995 | CR: $4,950 per year of life saved |
Georgiou et al. (2001) | Societal | N = 99 with HF | CEA | US dollars, 1999 | ICER = $1,773 per life year saved in favour of CR |
Marchionni et al. (2003) | Government or care providers | N = 158 with MI | CCA | US dollars, 2000 | CR: $21,298 per patient vs $12,433 per patient in No-CR group |
Yu et al. (2004) | Government | N = 204 after MI or PCI | CUA | US dollars, ?year | ICUR = $650 per QALY in favour of CR |
Huang et al. (2008) | Government | N = 4,324 after CABG | CEA | US dollars, 1998 | ICER = 13,887 per year of life saved in favour of CR |
Dendale et al. (2008) | Health care payers | N = 213 after PCI | CEA | Euro, ?year | CR: 4,862€ per patient and 5,498€ per patient in No-CR group |