Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Health Services Research

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices

  • Michael E Green1, 2, 3, 4, 5Email author,
  • William Hogg5, 6, 7,
  • Colleen Savage2, 3,
  • Sharon Johnston6, 7,
  • Grant Russell6, 7, 8,
  • R Liisa Jaakkimainen5, 9,
  • Richard H Glazier5, 9, 10,
  • Janet Barnsley5, 11 and
  • Richard Birtwhistle1, 2, 4
BMC Health Services Research201212:214

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-214

Received: 2 November 2011

Accepted: 23 July 2012

Published: 23 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Friedberg
22 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Green
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Green
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Michael Green
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
23 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-214

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine, Queen’s University
(2)
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University
(3)
Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen’s University, Abramsky Hall
(4)
Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen’s University
(5)
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
(6)
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
(7)
CT Lamont Primary Care Research Centre
(8)
Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University
(9)
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto
(10)
Centre for Research on Inner City Health and Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital
(11)
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto

Advertisement