This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia
© Jimenez-Puente et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 October 2011
Accepted: 20 July 2012
Published: 20 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Camille Le Ray|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sohinee Bhattacharya|
|8 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paloma Toledo|
|5 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alberto Jimenez-Puente|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paloma Toledo|
|14 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alberto Jimenez-Puente|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-207|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.