The burden of knowing: balancing benefits and barriers in HIV testing decisions. a qualitative study from Zambia
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessika Deblonde|
|22 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pam Baatsen|
|25 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Marte Jürgensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessika Deblonde|
|23 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pam Baatsen|
|3 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marte Jürgensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.