Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of the base case cost-effectiveness analysis (year 2010 values) from the social health insurance perspective (standard errors in parentheses)

From: A multi-perspective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin sodium for thromboprophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement in the German healthcare setting

Type of surgery

Costs (€)

Incremental costs (€)

VTE events per person

Incremental effect(events avoided)

ICER(€ per event avoided)

THR

     

Rivaroxaban

146.5 (14.2)

17.8 (19.6)

0.005 (0.002)

0.007 (0.005)

875

Enoxaparin

128.7 (14.9)

 

0.012 (0.005)

  

TKR

     

Rivaroxaban

20.7 (9.0)

−27.3 (10.7)

0.014 (0.005)

0.020 (0.007)

dominant

Enoxaparin

48.0 (16.9)

 

0.035 (0.009)

  
  1. THR = total hip replacement, TKR = total knee replacement, VTE = venous thromboembolism, ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.