Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A multi-perspective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin sodium for thromboprophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement in the German healthcare setting

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Björn Stollenwerk
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - carlo lucioni
29 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Jowett
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Björn Stollenwerk
30 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Jowett
Resubmission - Version 6
18 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
9 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-192

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement