This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A multi-perspective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin sodium for thromboprophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement in the German healthcare setting
© Zindel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 November 2011
Accepted: 11 June 2012
Published: 9 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Björn Stollenwerk|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - carlo lucioni|
|29 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sue Jowett|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Björn Stollenwerk|
|30 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sue Jowett|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|18 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|11 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-192|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.