Skip to main content

Table 2 Focus group themes: Factors affecting recruitment and retention

From: Retention of allied health professionals in rural New South Wales: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions

Theme

“Push” factor (leave job)

“Pull” factor (recruit/retain in job)

Personal factors:

Lack of job opportunities for spouses

 

Perceived inadequate quality of secondary schools

Attraction to rural lifestyle

Care for elderly parents

Good place to raise children

Retirement

Married to a local resident

Family members living in a metropolitan area

Rural origin/family in area

For younger AHP’s:

Low cost of living

Limited social opportunities

Personal engagement in the community

Desire for adventure/travel

 

Career progression:

Better career opportunities in metropolitan settings

NSW Health Award structure (accelerated promotion for new graduates in rural practice settings)

Lower income, smaller market for rural private practitioners

Recognition by peers and others

Rural senior positions unavailable or not open for recruitment

Advanced work roles

 

Appropriate remuneration

Workload and type of work:

Unmanageable workload

Altruism, making a difference

Crisis mode of service, reactive not preventive

Direct individual patient care

Paperwork, reporting requirements

Generalist practice with advanced work roles - ‘specialist generalist’

 

Challenge, variety and intellectual stimulation embedded in the job

Continuing Professional Development (CPD):

Limited access to CPD due to:

University campus in regional centres increases CPD access

Lack of management support to attend CPD events

Access to CPD:

Cost of travel

ameliorates professional isolation

Expensive registrations (metropolitan courses)

is strongly linked with job satisfaction

Time away from work

is essential for new graduates and isolated practitioners

High workload demands

Assures that senior clinicians skills remain up to date

 

Provides intellectual challenge and opportunities for career progression

The impact of management:

Perceived inequitable or inappropriate resource allocation

Supportive line managers

Nurse managers

Support for CPD access

Failure to recruit vacant positions

Clinical mentorship for new graduates

Constant change

Flexible work hours

Managers who are unresponsiveness to suggestions

Autonomy

Feeling de-valued

Equitable resource allocation sufficient to deliver clinical services

Ethical compromise – fiscal vs. clinical imperatives

Realistic estimate of workload capacity

 

Move to private practice to escape public sector “management