Clinicians’ and patients’ views of metrics of change derived from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for comparing providers’ performance of surgery
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stirling Bryan|
|7 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Zoe Hildon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nan Rothrock|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stirling Bryan|
|29 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Zoe Hildon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|21 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-171|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.