Open Peer Review Reports for: An overiew of non medical prescribing across one strategic health authority: a questionnaire survey
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Molly Courtenay |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eleanor Bradley |
| 10 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
| 9 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Molly Courtenay |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Molly Courtenay |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 15 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Molly Courtenay |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-138 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
