Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Showell|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hardeep Singh|
|2 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amirhossein Takian|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Showell|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hardeep Singh|
|27 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amirhossein Takian|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-105|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.