Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The social value of a QALY: raising the bar or barring the raise?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cam Donaldson
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Nord
7 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Greenberg
5 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cam Donaldson
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Greenberg
26 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Nord
21 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cam Donaldson
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cam Donaldson
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cam Donaldson
Resubmission - Version 7
13 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement